Tyler Mains, CPA/ABV, Managing Director and Demetri Pazarentzos, Director for their article. Check out bios on Tyler or Demitri via the Lazear Capital Partners website.
An Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) is a great solution for owners of construction companies looking to diversify their personal wealth, develop a succession plan, and/or seek an avenue to reward their employees. However, there are many factors to consider when a company who utilizes bonding is exploring or undertaking an ESOP. Because the surety relationship is vital to the operations and long-term success of many contractors, it is important to partner with the surety early in the ESOP process.
The surety is focused on supporting a company’s current and future bonding needs, while reducing or mitigating any potential risk. A leveraged ESOP can cause changes to the structure of a company’s balance sheet as a result of the likelihood of additional debt used to assist in financing the ESOP transaction. If the transaction and associated financing is structured correctly, the perfect balance of financial benefits to company owners, significant upside for key management and employees, and a favorable structure for both the surety and the lender can be achieved.
The following items should be considered for companies with surety relationships during an ESOP formation:
Overall, a surety is focused on the continuity of the business, with particular attention to adequate financial strength and liquidity and management retention post-ESOP transaction. When structured correctly, an ESOP can be a powerful tool to aide in the long-term succession plan for construction companies and make an extremely positive impact on the lives of employees, key management, and company owners.
Additionally, an ESOP-owned company can provide productivity improvements, tax benefits, and a clear competitive advantage in the labor market, all of which can be expected to drive financial performance. Our professionals are here to advise you on structuring a favorable ESOP transaction with lenders and your surety, while maximizing benefits for selling company owners.
" target="_blank">Four Considerations for Construction Companies Exploring or Undertaking an ESOP
- Advisors – surrounding the company with knowledgeable advisors who are well-versed in both the construction industry and ESOP transactions is key to ensuring a favorable transaction structure that maximizes benefits for the company owners, while maintaining flexibility for the company post-closing.
- Bank and Surety – running a parallel track with open communication to understand each stakeholders concerns or needs (i.e., “giving a seat at the table” early in the ESOP transaction process) leads to a structure that provides adequate financing to consummate the transaction, significant flexibility to support future working capital and capital expenditure requirements of the company, and maintains ample balance sheet strength to support ongoing bonding needs.
- Current Bonding Program – evaluating the following items of a company’s bonding program is important to aid in the surety’s analysis of bonding needs moving forward, which can have a significant impact on the surety’s comfort level in regards to balance sheet changes and financing proposed in the ESOP transaction: - Individual and aggregate project bonding limits - Accounts receivable and projects currently bonded (remaining work to be completed vs. total contract value) - Makeup of bonded vs. unbonded projects in backlog and pipeline - The timing and phases of bonded projects (planning/design phase vs. true construction underway) - Current and future working capital and equity levels (as adjusted for specific components found in an ESOP structure)
- Managing Personal and Corporate Guarantees – with owners of the company transitioning their ownership to the ESOP trust, special consideration to current and future guarantees required should be discussed during the transaction. An understanding of expectations of the bank or surety regarding guarantees and changes to these requirements (and the timing of these potential changes) is key to mitigating personal exposure for owners who may no longer have an ownership stake in the company.
Thanks to Tyler Mains, CPA/ABV, Managing Director and Demetri Pazarentzos, Director for their article. Check out bios on Tyler or Demitri via the Lazear Capital [...]